|
Continuing Medical Education Information |
STATEMENT OF NEED/TARGET
AUDIENCE
It is important for practicing oncologists to be
aware of similarities and differences between
his or her practice patterns, those of others
in community practice and those of breast
cancer clinical investigators. It is also important
for oncologists to recognize that heterogeneity
exists in the oncology community, especially in
clinical situations for which there is suboptimal
research evidence.
This program focuses on the self-described
practice patterns of randomly selected medical
oncologists on a variety of key clinical issues in
cancer. Also included are clinical investigator
commentary and references addressing these
issues. This CME program will provide medical
oncologists with information on national cancer
patterns of care to assist with the development
of clinical management strategies.
GLOBAL LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR
THE PATTERNS OF CARE SERIES
- Compare and contrast management strategies
of community oncologists and cancer
research leaders for the treatment of breast
cancer in the adjuvant and metastatic
settings.
- Discuss cancer management issues for
which relative agreement and heterogeneity
exist in patterns of care.
- Counsel cancer patients about multiple
acceptable treatment options when
they exist.
PURPOSE OF THIS ISSUE
The purpose of this issue of Patterns of Care is
to support these objectives by comparing the
perspectives of 150 randomly selected community
medical oncologists with 41 breast cancer
specialists and to offer in-depth commentary
from faculty regarding their practice patterns in
the management of breast cancer.
ACCREDITATION STATEMENT
Research To Practice is accredited by the
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical
Education to provide continuing medical education
for physicians.
CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT
Research To Practice designates this educational
activity for a maximum of 2.5 AMA PRA
Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only
claim credit commensurate with the extent of
their participation in the activity.
HOW TO USE THIS CME ACTIVITY
This monograph is one issue of a CME series
activity. To receive credit for this activity, the
participant should read the monograph and
complete the evaluation located in the back of
this book or on our website PatternsOfCare.com.
PowerPoint files of the graphics contained
in this document can be downloaded at
PatternsOfCare.com.
COMMERCIAL SUPPORT
This program is supported by education
grants from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP,
Genentech Inc, Genomic Health Inc, Roche
Laboratories Inc and Sanofi-Aventis.
PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS
DISCUSSED IN THIS PROGRAM
This educational activity includes discussion
of published and/or investigational uses of
agents that are not indicated by the Food
and Drug Administration. Research To Practice
does not recommend the use of any agent
outside of the labeled indications. Please refer
to the official prescribing information for each
product for discussion of approved indications,
contraindications and warnings. The opinions
expressed are those of the presenters and are
not to be construed as those of the publisher
or grantors.
FACULTY AFFILIATIONS/CONTENT
VALIDATION AND DISCLOSURES
Research To Practice is committed to providing
its participants with high-quality, unbiased and
state-of-the-art education. We assess potential
conflicts of interest with faculty, planners and
managers of CME activities. Real or apparent
conflicts of interest are identified and resolved
by a peer review content validation process.
The content of each activity is reviewed by both
a member of the scientific staff and an external
independent reviewer for fair balance, scientific
objectivity of studies referenced and patient
care recommendations.
The scientific staff and consultants for Research
To Practice are involved in the development and
review of content for educational activities and
report the following real or apparent conflicts
of interest for themselves (or their spouses/partners) that have been resolved through a
peer review process: John H Brebner, Richard
Kaderman, PhD, Neil Love, MD, Douglas Paley,
Michelle Paley, MD, Margaret Peng, Lilliam
Sklaver Poltorack, PharmD, Ginelle Suarez,
Erin Wall and Kathryn Ault Ziel, PhD — no
real or apparent conflicts of interest to report;
Sally Bogert, RNC, WHCNP — shareholder
of Amgen Inc and Genentech Inc. Research
To Practice receives education grants from
Abraxis Oncology, Amgen Inc, AstraZeneca
Pharmaceuticals LP, Bayer Pharmaceuticals
Corporation/Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Genentech Inc/OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc,
Genomic Health Inc, Roche Laboratories Inc
and Sanofi-Aventis, who have no influence on
the content development of our educational
activities.
DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
Financial disclosures for oncologists quoted in
this issue may be found in the cited CME pieces
and journal publications of origin.
COMMENTS IN THIS MONOGRAPH
To highlight the practice issues presented in this survey, a number of excerpts are included from CME publications and peer-reviewed journal
articles. For financial disclosures of authors, please refer to the original publications. Audio programs from Research To Practice can be accessed
at BreastCancerUpdate.com.
ABOUT THIS SURVEY
This survey was completed in October 2006 by 150 community-based medical oncologists and 41 oncologists who specialize in breast cancer
management (see list on pages 6-7) in the United States. The community-based oncologists were randomly selected from a proprietary mail list used
by Research To Practice for distribution of its CME programs, and the specialists included physicians who have participated in education programs
with Research To Practice and others referred for this project.
|